Societal Means
As we delve deeper into the world and a degraded society, it is evident that we have been targeted since a young age. What once was and shall always be is that we should be arranged according to our misgivings. With truth being evaded by present and absent powers, we are divided into our paths. Some are worthy, others are allowed, and others are taken aback. When we find ourselves in disorder, we are cast aside while malicious people reign free. The truth is the justice we get is what we are afforded. I have been ignoble sorts in my past and have come to see many truths. While afforded justice, cracks are often found where people could otherwise live potentially better lives. In a world of technological advancement, we find ourselves stricken by the vice we have created. The creation of vast arrays of equipment and inference has been a challenge; as we crave justice, we neglect the justice we are afforded ourselves. Promoting and deriving technology is designed to target solely based on money, irrespective of vice or burden on the society it intends to serve. While it has notably allowed me to write this, it has caused many ills and problems. Ease of access to vast arrays of unfettered vice is a way for the illicit discord of probable detriment. In perversion of society from youth to adult and vice versa. In many ways, we are contracting our system. By the great many doing the justice of the few and the few of the many, we are affording the consumer's rights to the capital holder. We are allowed only to consume, not question. From a young age, we are tempted with much evil. By propagating and neglecting the service of youth and affording them, not the rights afforded as reflected by my youth from me to others and others to self, the justice system affords many provisions. Still, it sometimes lacks self-provision for those in detriment. As such, when mentally incognizant, how do we afford justice? Is it to categorize and dehumanize or to find a way to progress to a conscious state? Do we afford a person access back to society, or do we cause them a detriment to dereliction? In defining cognition, do we afford one another the securities of discretion or dissemble them in our fair and common justice? What is discretion? How do we afford the sense of an ill or stricken mind? If stricken, how do we heal it? Do we crack an egg forever to gallows? Should a person be held to their weakest moment in their worst state of misdeeds? In the defense of justice, there is no cause for justice if there is no capable means of self-preservation in the face of evil. We leave each other to perish for a reason, another way to find a death to us we impart.
留言